Question:
Can a viable alternative power source truly be found?
anonymous
2006-07-11 21:31:21 UTC
So far we have not found an actual alternative power source other than what has already been discovered (hydro-electricity, nuclear power, fossil fuels, solar power etc.). The new sources of power are all power vectors (resultant from indirect use of one kind of power already in use. Is there some kind of power supply that we haven't found yet that will carry us into the future? Gravitational wave energy? Nucleonic resonance?
Ten answers:
extton
2006-07-11 21:43:20 UTC
We already have viable power sources. Solar power, wind power, wave power, so on and so forth. They're more than capable of providing all the energy we need and then some.



The real trick is storage.



That's the biggest advantage that hydrocarbons have - you can put 'em in a bottle and take them with you.



Storing electrical energy generated with solar power, or some such, as hydrogen through using electrolysis would work perfectly.



Some will say, "gee, if it's so easy, why haven't we already done it?"



the reason: social and economic inertia. There's a lot of money, time, and effort already put in to a hydrocarbon-based infrastructure. That leaves a lot of people invested in it in no hurry to change anything. It'll happen, but it will take a long time.



As for your suggestions...

Gravitational radiation is out of the question. It simply cannot carry enough energy to be of any use. Gravitational waves are so weak that we've yet to even detect them in experimental conditions.



Nucleonic resonance? I googled that, and it seems that it's a real term. However, i'd be very wary if you read anything about "alternative energy" that uses those kinds of phrases. It's probably nonsense and pseudoscience.
Perry L
2006-07-11 22:07:25 UTC
Much depends on what happens in Physics in the next few, maybe 10...probably 50, years. It's possible the LHC, the first super collider built in 30 plus years, will reveal some answers to some very tough/unsolvable questions facing modern physics. Certainly we know there is a huge amount of unaccounted for energy out there...but where?



In the meantime I would like to see some serious investment in Solar energy which has been relegated to research projects by post grads in a few material sciences programs. Seems that with the advances in material science within the industrial community that it shouldn't be too hard to bring solar energy out of the 1970's. I envision interconnected panels in the worlds sidewalks...every other square is a solar cell producing a few watts millions of squares millions of watts. Same thing for all the wasted roof space in all the cities.



Real electric cars are coming...they're being developed in Cupertino, CA. by the computer tech gurus who have plenty of money to burn and a real passion to make it happen...Move over Detroit, Tokyo and Stuttgart. They already have a prototype by one company there that does 0 to 60 in 4 secs with a top speed of 180 and a range of 250 miles...now we're talking.



The bottom line is we have to stop the CO2 madness that is the by-product of civilization.
Jordan P
2006-07-11 22:05:54 UTC
i think etheir franklin or edison said that he'd bet on the sun. solar energy that comes to the earth is 1000times greater than we will ever use, every day! well, its something amazingly huge like that. just being able to harness a small amount of that energy is worth looking into. thats where solar and even wind turbine technology come into play. i think electricity will run our lives, vehicles and everyhting elsee eventually, either with huge nuclear reactors or small sub stations or something of the sort. the US has the means to keep the waste from ding any real harm for as long as we need the energy. but thats just my take,



i am also very interested in biobutanol, almost 95% efficient as gas, so theres a lot to look into for the very near future, when oil will be tha thing of the past... the earth needs our help, thats for sure..
DoctaB01
2006-07-11 22:24:56 UTC
Yes. There are alternative power sources that would work today but we use oil because it is the cheapest to produce. Once oil is not the cheapest we will use something else like bio-diesel or solar power.



The energy we used is all based on economy. The cheapest energy source will be used until it isn't the cheapest anymore and then we will use something different.
Science teacher
2006-07-11 22:52:12 UTC
extton is right.



Ultimately we can do two things with energy:

- Store it

- Convert it to another kind of energy.



Solar converts light (and heat) to electrical energy.



Even nuclear power is just energy stored in the atom to heat energy... then heat energy is converted to electrical energy.



The one thing missing from most ideas that seem to harness energy from nowhere is that energy can only be released when there is a difference of potential.



Fusion reactors take several atoms that have higher potential (energy state) and force them together to individual ones that have a lower potential. The difference is released as radiation and heat energy.



Chemical reactions (like batteries, ie Duracell, pickles, potatoes etc) work by allowing electrons to move between regions that have molecules that react together with more electrons and regions that have molecules that react with the removal of electrons. The movement of the electrons is electricity.



Solar like thermocouples work with two regions of different heat or excitement. When light and/or heat falls on one surface, the under-surface becomes relatively less excited. The heat/light energy from the sun is tapped as electrical energy. So these devices just convert one kind of energy to another.



Wind - convert kinetic energy (physical movement of the wind) to electricity.



Note that there is always either two areas that have different potentials (like batteries), two different potentials that move from higher to lower, or a conversion of one type of energy to another.



In the case of potential differences, there must be a depletion over time. (Batteries die, fuel gets used up)



In the case of conversion, the energy source itself must come from somewhere. ie electricity from wind, wind from heat, heat from sun's fission. Eventually the sun's energy will become depleted.



So when you hear of a 'new source of energy' what you should be looking for is where is the original source. Look at what gets used up... something must.
marchetti
2016-12-01 07:50:37 UTC
a great number of countries do extremely properly with out nuclear skill. it truly is by technique of no potential mandatory. Australia has no nuclear skill flora. NZ has none both. even in spite of the indisputable fact that distinctive human beings keep putting forward Wind photo voltaic and so on are not from now on practicable for base load era they in reality are very proper. you only ought to configure them authentic consisting of inexpensive useful storage...pumped hydro is one such approach. there are an entire determination of renewable skill sources and a blend of many will be better than adequate to furnish each and each and every of the skill we decide.
anonymous
2006-07-11 21:47:15 UTC
Yes, ever heard of the Electro-Magnetic Body Synchronizer? This is so powerful that it eliminates the negative energy of your body. This is new but already used in the Philippines by few patients. If you need one, don't hesitate to get in touch with me and I will be glad to tell the inventory that you want to buy.
anonymous
2006-07-11 22:43:43 UTC
I believe that heat from the earths crust may be scrutinized to heat water or some medium to generate electricity with a steam turbine as a prime mover. There are other uses for steam generation as well.
presidentofallantarctica
2006-07-11 22:33:13 UTC
All power sources are, or have been, "alternative". We have continuously found new and better power sources throughout our history, and we will continue to do so, despite the grumbling of pessimists, luddites, and naysayers.
bloodhound96
2006-07-11 21:36:38 UTC
Well, anything is possible. All it takes is someone brave enough to try it, and to take the years of being called a crackpot until they prove it works.



Getting it past the oil companies may be impossible though.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...